Governments make 'pitiful' progress on oceans
By Richard Black . Environment correspondent, BBC News, Rio de Janeiro
June 14, 2012
Little has been done to protect marine life since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, conservation scientists conclude.
On pledges to protect key habitat and restrict the size of fishing fleets, they say progress has been "pitiful".
Their analysis is carried in the journal Science and is being discussed during final preparations for the Rio+20 summit, which opens next week.
Conservationists were delighted by Australia's move to set up the world's largest network of marine reserves.
But globally, the picture is bleak, they say.
"Our analysis shows that almost every commitment made by governments to protect the oceans has not been achieved," said Jonathan Baillie, director of conservation at the Zoological Society of London (ZSL).
"If these international processes are to be taken seriously, governments must be held accountable and any future commitments must come with clear plans for implementation and a process to evaluate success or failure."
June 14, 2012
Little has been done to protect marine life since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, conservation scientists conclude.
On pledges to protect key habitat and restrict the size of fishing fleets, they say progress has been "pitiful".
Their analysis is carried in the journal Science and is being discussed during final preparations for the Rio+20 summit, which opens next week.
Conservationists were delighted by Australia's move to set up the world's largest network of marine reserves.
But globally, the picture is bleak, they say.
"Our analysis shows that almost every commitment made by governments to protect the oceans has not been achieved," said Jonathan Baillie, director of conservation at the Zoological Society of London (ZSL).
"If these international processes are to be taken seriously, governments must be held accountable and any future commitments must come with clear plans for implementation and a process to evaluate success or failure."
Scientists say the failures of governments to pursue 20-year-old ocean conservation goals are plain to see
Progess reviewed
The researchers assessed the various pledges made at the landmark 1992 Earth Summit and 10 years later at the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development.
Governments vowed to establish an ecologically sound network of marine reserves by 2012, eliminate subsidies that contribute to illegal fishing, protect critical habitat, look after the needs of local fishermen and restore depleted stocks to healthy levels by 2015.
Subsidies have not been eliminated, and illegal fishing is still a major issue in some parts of the world.
Little over 1% of the seas are protected. Two years ago, governments agreed to raise that to 10% by 2020, but the new analysis shows that at the current rate of progress, the world is off course to meeting that target.
The pledge to restore stocks to healthy levels by 2015 has also seen slow progress. European ministers meeting earlier this week voted to give themselves until 2020 to achieve the target in EU waters.
The latest exception to this rather gloomy picture emerged earlier this week, when the Australian government announced it was creating a network of marine reserves around its shores that will cover 3.1 million sq km of water, including the ecologically rich Coral Sea off the Queensland coast.
Coming just before ministers arrive in Rio, conservationists hope it will inspire other countries to commit to strong safeguards.
Commitment concernOceans are one of the major themes of Rio+20.
The "package" of outcomes that government negotiators are discussing includes agreeing to establish marine reserves in international waters, agreeing on equitable use of the oceans' genetic resources, and western help for poor countries on technology.
A decision to phase out harmful subsidies is also possible.
But over the various rounds of preparatory talks that began six months ago, there has been little indication that all governments are keen on these moves.
The US is against pledging to share ocean genetic resources equitably; developing countries say that without such a pledge, they will not agree to protected areas on the high seas.
"We're worried that some countries are starting to back off commitments that they made 10 years ago in Johannesburg," said Sue Lieberman, director of international policy at the Pew Environment Group.
"But there is still time for countries to move beyond what they agreed to in 2002, especially on the high seas," she told BBC News.
Source
World failing to meet promises on the oceans
by Jeremy Hance - mongabay.com
June 14, 2012
Despite a slew of past pledges and agreements, the world's governments have made little to no progress on improving management and conservation in the oceans, according to a new paper inScience. The paper is released just as the world leaders are descending on Rio de Janeiro for Rio+20, or the UN Summit on Sustainable Development, where one of the most watched issues is expected to be ocean policy, in part because the summit is expected to make little headway on other global environmental issues such as climate change and deforestation. But the newSciencepaper warns that past pledges on marine conservation have moved too slowly or stagnated entirely.
"Our analysis shows that almost every commitment made by governments to protect the oceans has not been achieved. If these international processes are to be taken seriously, governments must be held accountable and any future commitments must come with clear plans for implementation and a process to evaluate success or failure," Jonathan Baillie, co-author and Director of Conservation at the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) who is currently attending the Rio+20 conference, said in a press release.
Assessing pledges on five marine environmental issues—improving fisheries management, eliminating harmful subsidies, combating illegal and unregulated fishing, setting up marine protected areas, and stemming biodiversity loss—the paper found little to crow about.
The researchers point out that the global fish catch is between 17-112 percent higher than sustainable, while almost a third of all fisheries are overexploited, depleted, or recovering from depletion, and predict that its likely "governments will fail to meet their commitments to maintain or restore stocks to maximum sustainable yield (MSY) either regionally or globally by 2015."
Furthermore, the researchers note that a decade after the World Trade Organization (WTO) pledged to reduce harmful fisheries subsidies—worth $16.2 billion in 2009—no plan has been agreed on.
"Harmful subsidies should be phased out by a set date or redirected into beneficial fisheries management plans by governments that choose to continue to provide subsidies," the scientists write.
Governments also need to redouble efforts to combat illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing, according to the paper.
"Ubiquitous [illegal, unregulated, and unreported] fishing undermines fisheries management; increases risks to target and by-catch species; steals profits from legitimate fishers and governing bodies," the authors write, noting that such fishing practices are worth up to $23 billion annually.
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) had pledged to set aside 10 percent of the ocean's waters as marine protected areas by 2012, but failed to meet that goal, which has now been pushed to 2020. Still, the scientists see some positive action on this end, including several new reserves announced in recent years, but warn that "the strength of protection for many designated areas is questionable, however, and needs improvement."
Notably, the Australian government announced today a plan to protect around 40 percent of its waters, creating the world's largest marine protected area network with a total area around the size of India.
Finally the researchers write that while there has been some progress on protecting biodiversity in local areas or with certain animals, like seabirds, for the most part "global assessments of marine biodiversity paint a bleak picture for many taxa; even the most cared for and most closely watched species—such as turtles, sharks, and coral reef fishes—are not safe."
Currently, 16 percent of so-called "charismatic" marine animals are threatened with extinction. Meanwhile recently experts have warned of mass extinction in the oeans if business-as-usual continues, including a failure to stem climate change.
"There are large scale changes occurring in the oceans that weren’t known to be a problem in 1992 or 2002, such as ocean acidification or mass coral bleaching, which we now know will make sustainable ocean management even more challenging. Rio+20 might be our last real chance to save ocean ecosystems and make sure we can manage marine fish stocks in a sustainable way," lead author and ZSL’s Marine Policy Officer, Liane Veitch, said.
Although the authors acknowledge that "the complexity of problems and the politics of cooperation have been greater than anticipated", they say world leaders must step up at Rio+20 where they have failed before.
"The livelihoods of millions, the food security of billions, and the safe functioning of our planet’s oceans are at stake," the scientists conclude.
This article was originally published in news.mongabay.com
The Afrika Super Trawler. Photo by: Pierre Gleizes/Greenpeace.
